Re: C-x C-x

[Andrew W. Nosenko]

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:40, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Andrew W. Nosenko" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:49, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> "Andrew W. Nosenko" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> About stop activating region by C-x C-x.  I'm (of course) unable to
>>>> speak for anyone who uses t-m-m, but for me C-x C-x, same as C-x C-x
>>>> C-x C-x is intentionally thing for activating region.  And usual goal
>>>> is to send this region to the external filter (as in C-x C-x C-u M-|).
>>>
>>> This works perfectly fine without activating the region first.
>>
>> May be :-) But I'm personally feel self very uncomfortable when don't
>> see what going to be changed (the region in this concrete case).
>
> C-x C-x will show you the other end of the region just fine without
> needing to activate it.

Yes, but I said not about "whether it's technically works or not".  I
said about my _personal_ feelings and, therefore, preferences.  I'm
prefer to see what I'm "going to eat".  And the better way for me to
see a region is to have it highlighted.

-- 
Andrew W. Nosenko <address@hidden>