[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:30:12 +0200 |
> From: Deniz Dogan <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:11:12 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > In KDE, pressing Alt-F4 is the same as clicking on the close button. The
> > keypress is intercepted by KDE and Emacs never sees it. IIRC that's not
> > the case for Windows.
> >
>
> I don't know about KDE, but on Windows it says the key is undefined.
>
> So is there any problem in binding it on Windows?
I don't think so. AFAIK, Alt-F4 is a window manager keybinding, not
an Emacs keybinding. The MS-Windows "window manager" doesn't have
that binding.
- Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/05
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/09
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/09
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/09
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/09
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/09
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/12
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/12
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Deniz Dogan, 2011/01/12