[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:49:18 -0800 |
> A simpler solution is to dump the problem onto the user: setup
> a `w32-passthrough-events' where the user can specify events
> that should be passed on to Windows's standard lib rather than
> handled by Emacs.
That would be good in any case: give users the option, no matter what the
default behavior is.
We also have `w32-register-hot-key', BTW:
(w32-register-hot-key [M-tab])
> But it still leaves open the question whether it should contain
> M-f4 or A-f4 (or use yet-another event representation), as well as
> what happens when the user hits C-x M-f4.
And it still leaves open the question of the _default_ behavior for this key.
Just which keys should be included by default in user option
`w32-passthrough-events'?
- RE: Bikeshedding "user choice", (continued)
- RE: Bikeshedding "user choice", Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding "user choice", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding "user choice", Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding "user choice", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding "user choice", Drew Adams, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, jasonr, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Jason Rumney, 2011/01/16
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Dimitri Fontaine, 2011/01/10
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Christopher Allan Webber, 2011/01/05
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/13
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/17