[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:38:09 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> > d> (a) let users bind `M-f4' in Emacs, but if unbound
>> > d> (b) look it up in `w32-passthrough-events' and
>> > d> if there pass it to Windows, or if not there
>> > d> (c) raise an unbound error.
>>
>> There is no "unbound error".
>
> Right. So change (c) to "show message saying that the key
> is unbound". Any key that is not bound in Emacs and is not listed in
> `w32-passthrough-events' would not be passed to Windows but would be handled
> by
> Emacs showing that message.
Fine. We are finally getting to the point.
> Least surprise also means that Emacs tells users what's happening. My own
> preference would be to not bind the key by default and give users a new
> command
> to bind it to, to pass it through to Windows.
Those two things are contradictory, aren't they? And for default
things we should care mostly for new users, or?
> But as I say, that's just my preference. I'm happy as long as users have a
> way
> to prevent the key from going to Windows. `w32-passthrough-events' sounds
> fine
> to me.
Ok, thanks. Maybe prevent an unbound key to be sent to the operating
system (as is the default for GUI systems) could be useful sometimes.
Though I kind of doubt it at the moment.
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, (continued)
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Lennart Borgman, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?,
Lennart Borgman <=
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/17
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/01/17
Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, grischka, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/01/18
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/18
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Stuart Hacking, 2011/01/19
- RE: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, Drew Adams, 2011/01/19
- Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is <M-f4> unbound?, PJ Weisberg, 2011/01/19