Re: md5 broken?

[Ken Raeburn]

On May 30, 2011, at 01:31, Paul Eggert wrote:
>   Another part
> is when a function is first declared without "inline" and then
> defined with "inline".  Emacs always done one or the other;
> otherwise its current use of "INLINE" wouldn't be safe.
> 
> Here's where this is documented:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.0/gcc/Inline.html

Ah, interesting.  I hadn't known about the second case.  I'll have to look at 
that a little more closely.  Thanks!

Ken