[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source"
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source" |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:24:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> writes:
> "Open source" doesn't contrast with GPL practical aspects at all
> IMHO. The GPL is of great practicability, also from a pure technical
> aspect. (Which again doesn't exclude questioning some stipulations...)
> People may well choose GPL for very practical reasons.
People may choose to eat hosts or burn furniture for very practical
reasons, but that's not a particularly meaningful aspect for explaining
their purpose.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", (continued)
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", Richard Stallman, 2011/06/15
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", Andreas Röhler, 2011/06/16
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", Jambunathan K, 2011/06/16
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", Andreas Röhler, 2011/06/16
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", address@hidden, 2011/06/16
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", Andreas Röhler, 2011/06/16
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source",
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/06/16