Re: Windows 64 port

[Fabrice Popineau]

with 'size_t' or 'uintptr_t' as appropriate, but other
type replacements are dubious and should generally be omitted.

I don't think so. Windows and Linux does not follow the same 64 bits rules (LLP64 vs LP64).

 

For example:

-      int i = 0, aligned = (intptr_t) ABLOCKS_BUSY (abase);
+      int i = 0;
+      intptr_t aligned = (intptr_t) ABLOCKS_BUSY (abase);
 

Here, the value of 'aligned' is either 0 or 1, so there's
no need to change its type.

It is kinf of strange to cast to intptr_t to store the result in a variable of different type ?

 

 

The changes to src/m/amdx86-64.h would break GNU/Linux and
need to be backed out and redone.
 

This mishandles Emacs integers outside the signed 32-bit range:

-#define XFASTINT(a) ((a) + 0)
+#define XFASTINT(a) ((int)((a) + 0))

I'll look into these ones.

-- 
Fabrice