[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:39:17 -0500 |
I don't think so. Windows and Linux does not follow the same 64 bits rules
(LLP64 vs LP64).
Windows is a system, but Linux is a kernel. Do you mean the GNU/Linux
system? I don't think these conventions come from Linux at all;
they come from GCC, GNU libc, etc.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
- Re: Windows 64 port, (continued)
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/24
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29