[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:27:04 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:39:17 -0500
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> I don't think so. Windows and Linux does not follow the same 64 bits rules
> (LLP64 vs LP64).
>
> Windows is a system, but Linux is a kernel. Do you mean the GNU/Linux
> system?
No, he means the ABI supported by the development environment.
- Re: Windows 64 port, (continued)
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/24
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/28
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/29
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/29