[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:58:39 +0300 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:47:40 +0200
> Cc: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>,
> Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> A few comments about INSTALL.MSYS:
Thanks.
> - It says that GTK includes PNG, JPEG and TIFF libraries. PNG is in
> its own standalone package, but in a not-exhaustive check, I didn't
> find JPEG and TIFF libraries here. Perhaps a pointer could be useful.
I just removed the reference to JPEG and TIFF. (Perhaps they are
included in some other package; if someone knows, please tell.)
> - The example invocation of msysconfig.sh says:
>
> CPPFLAGS='-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1' CFLAGS='-O0 -g3' ./nt/msysconfig.sh
> --prefix=PREFIX --enable-checking
>
> but I suppose -DGLYPH_DEBUG=1 shouldn't be required if using
> --enable-checking=yes,glyphs, should it?
Old habits die hard, and that is just an example. If you have better
examples, I'm all ears.
> - You mentioned in a thread that the way to make a binary tarball is
> to use "make install prefix=SOMEWHERE" and then create a tar archive
> from SOMEWHERE. That should be mentioned, I think; also, that
> procedure does not copy libXpm.dll (which the configure.bat based
> build method could do by using --distfiles), so that should be noted
> too.
I'd prefer that someone who actually did that describe this.
> - There's now a --with-file-notification=w32 option that isn't on by
> default. Perhaps worth mentioning?
It is on by default. I don't see why it should be mentioned when
other configure options aren't.
> > Do you have EMACSLOADPATH set in the environment or something?
>
> Aha. No, I don't have EMACSLOADPATH in the environment, but yesterday
> I did a "make install" of some older release and it added
> EMACSLOADPATH (and friends) to the registry. Removing these makes the
> warning disappear.
Good. One more mystery eats dust.
Thanks.
- Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/01
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/01
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/03
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/03
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Juanma Barranquero, 2013/06/03
Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/02
- Re: Posix build on Windows: parallel `make' broken, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/02