Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:24 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> >> AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that
> >> require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer).
> > I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time.
> 
> Why?

You didn't give any reasons for your assertions, either.