Re: Wherein I argue for the inclusion of libnettle in Emacs 24.5

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

Ted Zlatanov writes:

 > Encryption is not an optional feature, it's a part of the security
 > model (of which Emacs has very little, as a language and as a platform).

Precisely.  You've just explained in two lines why you're going to
lose this battle.

Until Emacs *has* a security model, as a language or as a platform,
encryption *is* "just a feature".  Without that, your best bet is to
sign on with larsi's "it's a f---ing important f---ture, g-------t!"
line.

I-don't-expect-you-to-listen-or-understand-but-may-as-well-try-ly y'rs,