[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:35:45 +0100 |
address@hidden (Phillip Lord) writes:
> I'd add a fourth. People who want to extend Emacs for their own purposes
> have to learn it. Having JS extensibility would be an enourmous win.
>From what I've seen that isn't true. Most people learn just enough to
fix their problem.
Emacs Lisp is many people's least understood practical language (by
which I mean, they understand enough to do something with it). A bit
like Javascript used to be (how do I verify a form before it submits
again?)
Nic
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17
performance isn't a concern in ... Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17
Re: performance isn't a concern in ... Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/09/18
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17