[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
mhw |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 01:04:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> That's not all that much manpower. If you take a look at the commits in
> the master branch that are not merges from the stable branch, I think
> that more than 90% are from Andy Wingo.
That's an interesting way to pretend that Ludovic and I don't exist, by
excluding merges. Why should our contributions be excluded just because
they start out on the stable-2.0 branch and later flow to master by way
of merges?
Mark
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again)), (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
mhw <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mark H Weaver, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17