[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:50:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Nic Ferrier <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 11:53:16 +0100
>>
>> I hope the tooling will bring more people which will re-energize the
>> current community and add positivity.
>
> Sorry, but I will believe it when I see it.
When I started coding clojure a couple of years ago, I went through a
process of rediscovering the state of the art in Emacs even though I
have been using it for 20 years; not just the Clojure specific stuff,
but things like magit.
In terms of tooling, I would argue strongly that package.el and more
recently MELPA stable have made a significant difference to the
community. It is now incredibly easy for me to update one of my
packages, do a release and have it in peoples hands.
I write code in the first instance for my own benefit. Decreasing the
additional effort that I need to make to release it to others is an
important contribution.
I am with Nic; I think it's already happening.
Phil
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/09/17
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Phillip Lord, 2014/09/17
performance isn't a concern in ... Emacs Lisp's future, Nic Ferrier, 2014/09/17
Re: performance isn't a concern in ... Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/09/17