[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-x 8 shorthands for = and =
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: C-x 8 shorthands for = and = |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 May 2015 15:33:35 -0700 (PDT) |
> > I disagree. I use « and » from time to time, and I /never/ wanted
> > to use ≪ or ≫.
>
> FWIW I'm in the same situation.
And I'm wondering why we need to provide such "shortcuts". It is
*trivial* for anyone to bind keys to insert any chars one uses often.
I don't see how we're doing anyone any favors by this.
What's so special about any particular set of Unicode chars that we
should bother to offer a predefined set of bindings for them (even if
turning on that set is optional)? Now we're even down to looking to
bind ≫ or »? How silly is that? (Well, I'm sure those chars are
very useful for some people - but those who need 'em can bind 'em.)
Where's the beef?
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, (continued)
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Yuri Khan, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Artur Malabarba, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Rasmus, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Stefan Monnier, 2015/05/11
- RE: C-x 8 shorthands for = and =,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/12
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/12
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/05/11
- Re: C-x 8 shorthands for ≤ and ≥, Kaushal, 2015/05/11