Re: Dynamic loading progress

[Aurélien Aptel]

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Aurélien Aptel
<address@hidden> wrote:
> We have to be careful with this vtable thing. I don't want to end up
> with C++-level complexity with operator overloading, copy/move
><snip>
> module side. For example, a module could return new "types" using a
> cons ('my-type . ID) where ID is an integer index into a pointer table
> handled by the module author. It's more work for module writers but it
> works and keeps the complexity of the module interface low.

To be clear, I still prefer the opaque pointer type with the vtable
thingy solution. I was just showing alternatives.