[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse
From: |
TC |
Subject: |
Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:23:43 +0100 |
In response to address@hidden writing:
> Could you expand upon what Muse is ...
John Wiegley replied:
> Muse is the next stage in emacs-wiki's evolution...
Maybe I'm reading to much into the word "next", and at the risk
of trying to mess with the shoelaces of the original
author of emacs-wiki, is the above really true?
By the looks of things, people like Sacha, Damien, Mark, etc [1]
have the bit seriously between their teeth in maintaining and
further developing emacs-wiki.
muse may be a *new* development (a cool-looking one at that), but is
it really the *next* stage, as opposed to an alternative or
additional offering?
(No doubt the whole lot will be smooshed into one all-singing
all-dancing planner fest by the indomitable Sacha :-) ) [2]
tc
[1] Who *is* the current blessed owner? John's site suggests Damien.
The link to Damien, redirects to Mark. And Mark's page says it's
Sacha.
[2] Never can be sure, can you, if the closing parens of a smiley
that is itself used *within* parens, should double up as the closing
parens of the main parens? (If you see what I mean :-) )
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse,
TC <=
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, Mark Triggs, 2004/06/17
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: Planner and Muse, Sacha Chua, 2004/06/17
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, John Wiegley, 2004/06/17
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, TC, 2004/06/18
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, John Wiegley, 2004/06/18
- muse comments? (was Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse, TC, 2004/06/19
- [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, John Wiegley, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, TC, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/06/20
- Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Re: muse comments?, John Wiegley, 2004/06/20