|
| From: | James Crotinger |
| Subject: | RE: [pooma-dev] RFA: Reorder Initializers (2 of 3) |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:35:19 -0800 |
I don't have a problem with reordering the ctor initializers to match
the ordering in the class. This strikes me as good style, but I am a
little concerned if GCC requires this. I didn't think the standard did.
I do have a problem with it. If I make a change in the ordering in the class I have to remember to reorder the initializers in all of the constructors. That can be a major pain in the ass.
Like Jim, I do have a problem with adding base default base class
initializers. I thought the compiler was supposed to do this implicitly.
Is this a stylistic change or a GCC-required change or is this required
by the standard?
Scott
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |