Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter

[Nikolaus Waxweiler]

> Also, if possible, could you suggest a good CFF font for testing
> changes? Right now, I'm using one from Google Fonts but it looks wonky
> when hinted at small sizes, even on master branch. Perhaps there is
> some font the appearance of which is already familiar to you (and
> hence any regressions are more apparent) ?

You can use http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git to test
things. URW++ provided Type1, CFF and TTF versions of the base
Postscript fonts. The Type 1 fonts even had more than 256 glyphs per
font last time I checked. The quality of the fonts is... ho-hum. The
hinting (and by extension, the outlines) is off sometimes. But maybe
it's enough for testing :)