[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems
|
From: |
Jonas Diemer |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:24:45 +0200 |
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:58:24 +0300 (IDT)
Shlomi Fish <address@hidden> wrote:
> For merging and for tracking changes to previous versions of the file?
> It's also less resource-hungry, time-consuming and space-consuming.
I believe you are thinking to subversionish now... I would suggest you
choose your categories a bit differently, comparing revision control
tasks rather than technical stuff... In a software developers mind
(using a scm) copying files at the repository level doesn't make any
sense, until you put a meaning in it, as the svn manual states. One
meaning is, to create a branch. arch has different means for that
purpose (and other svn copy uses).
Jonas
[Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems,
Jonas Diemer <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Peter Conrad, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Momchil Velikov, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Aspect, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Tom Lord, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Ollivier Robert, 2003/09/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems, Jonas Diemer, 2003/09/08