Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Vim arch repository.

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

>>>>> "David" == David Brown <address@hidden> writes:

    David> A category of vim makes sense.

Please think carefully about that.  I came to the opposite conclusion
about XEmacs vs GNU Emacs.  I don't see any hope for full merge of the
projects in the short to medium term.  But there's enough shared code,
and there could be more, that having xemacs and gnu-emacs branches of
one emacs category makes sense.

vim may very well be farther diverged from the other vi family
members, so I'm just recommending careful thought, not taking a position.

-- 
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.