[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Vim arch repository.

[Miles Bader]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> I came to the opposite conclusion about XEmacs vs GNU Emacs.  I don't
> see any hope for full merge of the projects in the short to medium
> term.  But there's enough shared code, and there could be more, that
> having xemacs and gnu-emacs branches of one emacs category makes
> sense.

I vaguely thought it would be cute if the emacs/xemacs sources used the
same taglines/external-tags for common files...

   `Let's see what mkpatch makes of _THIS_!'

-Miles
-- 
Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.