[Gnu-arch-users] is star-merge right for me?

[Dustin Sallings]

	Is star-merge the appropriate way to catch up my branch?  It's doing  
something strange when I'm trying to update.  I was around patch 167,  
but it's doing this:

dustinti:~/prog/eprojects/tla-1.1-dustin/src/tla 587% tla star-merge  
address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1
* build reference tree for address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-170
* from archive cached: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-100
* patching for revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-101
* patching for revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-102
[...]
* star-merge by  
delta(address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-167,address@hidden 
2003b/tla--devo--1.1--patch-170)[/Users/dustin/prog/eprojects/tla-1.1- 
dustin/src/tla]
* build reference tree for address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-167
* from archive cached: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-100
* patching for revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-101
[..]

        It seems to be doing a lot of work.

	I did just undefine and redefine the location of address@hidden  
if that makes a difference.

	Previously, I've used replay to perform these updates and it seemed to  
do a lot less work.

--
SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________