Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is star-merge right for me?

[Robert Anderson]

On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:24, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> 
>       Is star-merge the appropriate way to catch up my branch?  It's doing  
> something strange when I'm trying to update.  I was around patch 167,  
> but it's doing this:
> 
> dustinti:~/prog/eprojects/tla-1.1-dustin/src/tla 587% tla star-merge  
> address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1
> * build reference tree for address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-170
> * from archive cached: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-100
> * patching for revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-101
> * patching for revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-102
> [...]
> * star-merge by  
> delta(address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-167,address@hidden 
> 2003b/tla--devo--1.1--patch-170)[/Users/dustin/prog/eprojects/tla-1.1- 
> dustin/src/tla]
> * build reference tree for address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-167
> * from archive cached: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-100
> * patching for revision: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-101
> [..]
> 
>       It seems to be doing a lot of work.

You mean in building the reference tree?  No biggie.  You might want to
either cacherev in a few spots on the tla--devo--1.1 line (between
patch-100 and the latest revision), or maybe create a revision library
for that version.

Bob