Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers

[John Goerzen]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:00:22PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Are you considering cscvs "ready" at such time as you're able to run in
> > front-to-back even with the 2 redundant changesets (on average) for each

> For a final "official" import having the bkcvs knowledge sounds
> reasonable. Note that it's much easier to use the bkcvs changeset
> numbers in the logs to deduce the patchsets for arch than to guess them
> with an heuristic.

I agree.  "Ready" is vague.  Right now, I'll define "ready" as "the thing
imports correctly and works in a reasonable amount of time."  Later we'll
define "ready" as "a 1:1 ratio exists for BK changesets to Arch changesets,
and all renames/moves are tracked."

-- John