[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <addre
From: |
Zack Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic) |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:11:45 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:57:37PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Robin Farine wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Davide" == Davide Libenzi <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Davide> It punctually happened that I fired a commit w/out a make
> > Davide> distclean and a bunch of cr*p (mainly stuff inside
> > Davide> autom4te.cache) went inside the patch. [...] So prefer to
> > Davide> care one order of magnitude less (during move/add/del)
> > Davide> instead of one order of magnitude more (during commits).
> >
> > You don't seem to realize that the inventory mechanism involves two
> > distinct notions:
> >
> > 1) tagline|explicit|name
> > tells arch where to find the unique id (tag) of file system objects
> >
> > 2) untagged-source source|precious|backup|junk|unrecognized
> > tells arch how to classify a non-tagged file system object
>
> Like I said a few times before, it is difficult for me to classify
> "source" with a reg-ex rule because it frequently happen that I have
> .c/.pl/and-other-usually-recognized-as-source in my tree w/out being part
> of the repository (mainly short lived test/cr*p files).
Why not adopt a naming convention for your crap files, and then have a
simple regex to match them?
Be well,
Zack
> My future setups
> will be:
>
> tagline (arch experts suggestion)
> +
> untagged-source unrecognized (strict commits)
>
> Sounds good ?
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
--
Zack Brown
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic),
Zack Brown <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Stig Brautaset, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03