[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit
From: |
Andrea Arcangeli |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 00:21:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:03:20PM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:14:26PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > As said I really want to execute add/move/delete-tag, it's a feature. As
> > such I've to keep tagline disabled. I don't want to depend on file
> > contents for the revision control.
> ...
> > I just feel unreliable with taglines. And I risk pain if somebody sends
> > two files with the same arch-id to Linus from two different projects
> > (though it's a very small risk). And you force me to watch those
> > metadata garbage that annoys me ;)
>
> This is a very strange thread. tla already allows you to choose not to
> use taglines, so there doesn't seem to be any reason to argue about it.
>
> So, if we assume you use 'explicit' tagging, then are you still unable to
> get what you need from tla? What else is missing, aside from the speedup
Of course not, explicit is exactly what I want. the context thread here
was not about explicit, it was only about the suggestion to use taglines
for l-k. If the l-k main repository will use taglines, then when I
checkout I will get it too and I understood at the moment changing
between taglines to explicit isn't trivial.
Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Stig Brautaset, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit,
Andrea Arcangeli <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Ethan Benson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Collins, 2003/10/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/05