[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <addre
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic) |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 21:43:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:30:07AM +0200, Robin Farine wrote:
> Miles> We should come to some decision on how tla should support
> Miles> .cvsignore-style per-directory source-hygiene files, as I
> Miles> think that will be more comfortable for many people (and
> Miles> help solve annoying same-name-different-dir-different- type
> Miles> problems). That thread seems to have died out though...
>
> Yes, I'd like to have this too. I understood the boss more or less
> agreed for a per-directory .ignorefoo with overriding regexps, and a
> fall back to common regexps. So let's find a good name for .ignorefoo
> and ship it!
Well, in the way it usually happens, the conversation veered towards having
something more featureful -- since arch actually has various source
categories, rather than just ignored and not-ignored, the suggestion was made
that maybe the per-directory files should actually allow extending all the
categories established in =tagging-method.
This seems like a reasonable idea, but I think there was some question about
how easy it would be to implement.
-Miles
--
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic),
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Stig Brautaset, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Robert Anderson, 2003/10/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Ethan Benson, 2003/10/04