[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <addre
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic) |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Oct 2003 09:02:08 +1000 |
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 08:56, Robin Farine wrote:
> >>>>> "Davide" == Davide Libenzi <address@hidden> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Davide> tagline (arch experts suggestion)
> Davide> +
> Davide> untagged-source unrecognized (strict commits)
>
> Davide> Sounds good ?
>
> Yes, but then you won't be able to commit in presence of untagged
> sources. You'll need to either adjust your naming conventions and
> classification regexps to move the untagged stuff to the appropriate
> categories (i.e. precious, backup or junk) or, before each commit, to
> carefully look at the output of tla -u for sources lacking a tag and
> then delete the rest.
OR:
use untagged-source precious, which will operate more like CVS does:
* tag-lined or added source will be commited.
* other source will be preserved.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robert Collins, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic),
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Robin Farine, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Miles Bader, 2003/10/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Tom Lord, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Stig Brautaset, 2003/10/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit (was Linus Torvalds <address@hidden> Re: log-buf-len dynamic), Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Zack Brown, 2003/10/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: taglines vs explicit, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/10/03