[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation)
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation) |
|
Date: |
16 Feb 2004 09:28:53 +0900 |
Oops:
I wrote:
> In my experience the bandwidth-saving aspects of a mirror actually matter
> more for the meta-info than for the actual data, so another possibility would
> be to allow `partial mirrors', where revision directories can contain
> meta-info
^ Insert `only' here...
-Miles
--
97% of everything is grunge
- [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Miles Bader, 2004/02/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Robert Collins, 2004/02/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Charles Duffy, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16