[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validat
|
From: |
Charles Duffy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:26:44 -0600 |
It sounds like what you want is a web cache built into Arch. Why not
just use a dedicated, separate piece of software [ie. a caching proxy]
built for that purpose?
Yes, this doesn't work for non-HTTP archives, but I'd expect those to be
a minority of cases (except for *your own* archives, and there keeping a
full mirror or using arch's more conventional mechanisms should DTRT).
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Miles Bader, 2004/02/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Robert Collins, 2004/02/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation),
Charles Duffy <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16