[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependen
From: |
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 04:30:06 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Fri, Feb 20 2004 at 03:57:28AM BRT, Aaron Bentley <address@hidden> wrote:
> Cameron Patrick wrote:
>
> >
> >Protecting against a lack of backups is not what cacherevs are for. If
> >the archive is important to you, keep mirrors of it in several locations.
> >
> >
> Protecting against lack of backups is a purpose cacherevs do serve.
> I've done some experiments,and not all of the tla--devo ancestry is
> online. (looks like address@hidden is gone) Without cacherevs,
> we'd be sunk.
And, as it is, if I understood it correctly, we no longer have the
history associated with that archive, nor can have, unless the archive is
summoned back from the dead...
rbp
--
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel <address@hidden>
http://isnomore.net GPG KeyId: <0x0DB14978>
Winning isn't everything, but losing really sucks.
- [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Robert Collins, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Cameron Patrick, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?,
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Jean Helou, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Robin Farine, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20