[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch.
From: |
Charles Duffy |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch. |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:59:28 -0600 |
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 17:45, Pierce T.Wetter III wrote:
> My issue right now is that any development process needs to decide
> where "truth" lives.
>
> In CVS land, that is HEAD, from the central server. In our case, we
> use CVS with a pretty simple model, because revision numbers are
> meaningless for us. There's what's deployed, and there's what's in
> development. Periodically, development gets deployed.
>
> In arch land, you have to decide where truth lives. There's also
> explicit provision for versions, which ends up confusing me, because
> I'm not used to thinking about versions.
Let me suggest something like the following:
${YOUR_OFFICIAL_ARCHIVE}/myproject--release
${YOUR_OFFICIAL_ARCHIVE}/myproject--devel
and there you are. Use tla-pqm or somesuch to control commits into
${YOUR_OFFICIAL_ARCHIVE}/myproject--devel, and do tags over to
${YOUR_OFFICIAL_ARCHIVE}/myproject--release manually as appropriate.
Developers can have ${MY_PERSONAL_ARCHIVE}/myproject--devel, but that's
pretty clearly not where truth lives unless it's been merged over to the
official archive.
How's that work for you?
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Tom Lord, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Paul Hedderly, 2004/02/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Stig Brautaset, 2004/02/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Jan Hudec, 2004/02/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/02/23
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., John Goerzen, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Tom Lord, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Miles Bader, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Robin Farine, 2004/02/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., John Goerzen, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., Charles Duffy, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why we might use subversion instead of arch., John Goerzen, 2004/02/27