[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues
From: |
William Dode |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:48:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (James Blackwell) writes:
>> On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 10:03, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * The changeset format is defined relative to GNU patch and GNU
>>> tar. These data formats are still somewhat in flux.
>>
>
> Colin Waters wrote:
>> Can you back this up? I have never heard of any problems.
>
>
> I can come up with two examples.
>
> GNU diff and patch are required, so that the BSD diffutils are no longer
> sufficient for arch. This evolving has affected arch, which has decided
> (rightly) to follow the GNU path of development.
>
> Also, we require a relatively recent version of GNU diffutils. I believe
> that arch doesn't work with the GNU diffutils as packaged by the woody
> version of Debian/GNU
>
> Granted, this evolution is relatively minor and slow paced. However, gnu
> arch is very exacting on how diffutils perform. This means that even
> minor differences between versions of diffutils present a go/no-go
> situation for gnu arch.
Why tar, diff and patch are not include inside tla ? It will avoid this kind of
problem...
--
William Dodé - http://flibuste.net
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues,
William Dode <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 2004/06/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/14