[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:49:39 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > I am willing to accept as a hypothesis that some languages may be
> > faster to write than others, but there is no more than circumstancial
> > evidence in both directions. Furthermore without a way to quantify the
> > skill of a programmer in a given language, in a manner comparable to
> > the skill of a different programmer in a different language, I don't
> > think it is possible to have real evidence either way. So you won't
> > really get much mileage out of it.
>
> the simple evidence is whole IT industry, especially focusing on bussiness
> oriented systems. Don't you see all these projects slowly migrating from C
> to C++, from C++ to Java or even to VisualBasic/Python?
> The truth is simple, highler-level languages are more easier to be used,
> more quickly to be written than such double-edged knife like C/C++.
Please try thinking before sending mail.
> > Subjectively, the programmer appears to be the primary factor in
> > determining productivity, not the language.
>
> I'm afraid you are not right. Have you ever tried modern OO-based
> languages like Eiffel
Okay, slight corrention: it is possible to design a language that
significantly *impairs* productivity, to the point where it is the
primary factor.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: darcs vs tla, Yann Droneaud, 2004/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Yann Droneaud, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Jan Hudec, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Aaron Bentley, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Karel Gardas, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Karel Gardas, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Florian Weimer, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Bruce Stephens, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Robert Collins, 2004/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Miles Bader, 2004/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Cameron Patrick, 2004/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Safer star-merge (was Re: darcs vs tla), Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla, Catalin Marinas, 2004/11/15