Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: darcs vs tla

[Karel Gardas]

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Andrew Suffield wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:43:14PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > > I am willing to accept as a hypothesis that some languages may be
> > > faster to write than others, but there is no more than circumstancial
> > > evidence in both directions. Furthermore without a way to quantify the
> > > skill of a programmer in a given language, in a manner comparable to
> > > the skill of a different programmer in a different language, I don't
> > > think it is possible to have real evidence either way. So you won't
> > > really get much mileage out of it.
> >
> > the simple evidence is whole IT industry, especially focusing on bussiness
> > oriented systems. Don't you see all these projects slowly migrating from C
> > to C++, from C++ to Java or even to VisualBasic/Python?
> > The truth is simple, highler-level languages are more easier to be used,
> > more quickly to be written than such double-edged knife like C/C++.
>
> Please try thinking before sending mail.

I had. Where I did mistake?

Thanks,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com