Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal

[Matthew Dempsky]

Yann Droneaud <address@hidden> writes:

>>     > We switch from bazaar to cathedral model
>>
>> I'm not sure that that's even a meaningful statement.  
>
> I tried to mean that James was merging patches as they come, without
> following a development schedule of what features to add, merge,
> improve: it's bazaar style.
>
> As i read the rel-src-mgt.txt, we need some sort of roadmap for the new
> features (bug fix are generally not candidate for that ;) :
> this is catheadraal style.

I have to agree with Tom -- arguing whether this is bazaar or
cathedral's not meaningful.  The new process still involves third
parties being able to participate in development, a central authority
over the mainline tree, and a mechanism for having patches
incorporated.

Feel free to call that process whatever you will.  A rose by any other
name...