[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 08:34:22 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Matthew Dempsky <address@hidden>
> I expect the necessary changes can be made by simply commiting a patch
> to add =merges with all the versions I've merged patches from,
Sounds right to me.
> or if
> it's necessary to know in the individual patches I can undo all the
> work I've done right now and remerge them.
Gosh, no.
Oh, it's monday. Right. We're supposed to conjure up a test
candidate this week. Up for it?
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal,
Thomas Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Yann Droneaud, 2004/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Thomas Lord, 2004/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Yann Droneaud, 2004/11/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Potential flaw in patch-log pruning in proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/11/12