[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress
From: |
David Allouche |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:59:49 +0200 |
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 19:12 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 11:46 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> >
> > Is it a bug that inventory -t doesn't catch "."? Or is this a design
> > decision?
>
> Its not an explicit decision, and I think its reasonable to consider it
> a bug.
My gut reaction here was "hell no!"
Then I realised that I do have several scripts around to work with
nested trees, and they all do something to add the tree-root to the
output of "inventory --nested --trees".
And I remembered the previous discussions on associating an inventory ID
to the tree-root. The tree-root used to be a bit special, but it's
actually a problem to the changeset logic.
So, yes, "inventory --trees" should list the tree-root.
Please remind me to add the test cases and necessary compatibility logic
to PyBaz when you'll do the change.
--
-- ddaa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Robert Collins, 2005/04/03
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress,
David Allouche <=
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/03
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Robert Collins, 2005/04/04
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/04
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, David Allouche, 2005/04/05
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/05
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, David Allouche, 2005/04/06
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] BitKeeper drops gratis product, support for Linux kernel development, Andy Tai, 2005/04/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BitKeeper drops gratis product, support for Linux kernel development, Catalin Marinas, 2005/04/06