[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:33:12 +0900 |
On 6/23/05, Robert Collins <address@hidden> wrote:
> The plan was to consolidate the reporting so that we had
> RM install-sh => install
>
> to indicate a rename & modified. Much like your wiki page suggests ;0.
I don't know if that form is really much more useful than the old
form; at first glance, it seems more complex for automatic processing.
For human users it's probably a wash.
Anyway, the format should be consistent between commands, shouldn't be
_gratuitously_ different from the old format (even if it's determined
that "unified entry" for each files is definitely better, the format
could definitely be closer to the old format -- if nothing else,
simply put the "R column" _after_ the "normal column"), and should be
discussed as part of a common change for tla/baz/etc.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status), (continued)
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/20
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Matthieu Moy, 2005/06/21
- Message not available
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Miles Bader, 2005/06/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Martin Pool, 2005/06/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status, Robert Collins, 2005/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status,
Miles Bader <=