Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 10:57 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> address@hidden (James Blackwell) writes:
> 
> > I don't see this behavior with a not-too-old tree. The actions are listed
> > in column 0:
> 
> But the "M" are listed in column 1:
> 
> $ baz status
> * looking for address@hidden/proj--scratch--2--patch-59 to compare with
> * comparing to address@hidden/proj--scratch--2--patch-59
> D   .arch-ids/INSTALL.id
> D   INSTALL
> A   .arch-ids/bar.id
> A   bar
> R   .arch-ids/configure.ac.id => .arch-ids/configure.in.id
> R   .arch-ids/install-sh.id => .arch-ids/install.id
> R   configure.ac => configure.in
> R   install-sh => install
>  M  install
> $
> 
> (it happens that a letter is displayed both in column 0 and in column
> 1, but I don't remember in which circumstance)

The plan was to consolidate the reporting so that we had
RM install-sh => install 

to indicate a rename & modified. Much like your wiki page suggests ;0.

Rob

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part