[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:35:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> > application WITH VERY visible caption "THIS part comes from xxxx and
>> > is based on GPL license"?
>>
>> Only if the work as a whole is licensed under the GPL without further
> ^
> |
> derivative --+
>
> It means that "THIS part comes from xxxx and is based on GPL license"
> (which is a derivative work) as a whole must be licensed under the GPL
> and only the GPL.
Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was
supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived
from (among others) the GPLed piece.
> All the rest falls under "mere aggregation".
>
> Stop bullshiting poor Marcin, retard dak.
He can, of course, read the GPL FAQ and find out just _who_ is
bullshitting him here.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, (continued)
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17