[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:09:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was
>> supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived
>> from (among others) the GPLed piece.
>
> His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot.
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040207022922296
>
> SCO:
>
> 30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred
> to as UNIX “flavors.” All commercial UNIX “flavors” in use today are
> modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V
> Technology (“System V Technology”).
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004040118450269
>
> IBM:
>
> 30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and
> Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps,
> manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx".
Cute. Another completely irrelevant quote. Court filings (not even a
judgment) for a completely different setting.
You are really striking wild lately.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, (continued)
- Message not available
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17