[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:15:42 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> > application WITH VERY visible caption "THIS part comes from xxxx and
> > is based on GPL license"?
>
> Only if the work as a whole is licensed under the GPL without further
^
|
derivative --+
It means that "THIS part comes from xxxx and is based on GPL license"
(which is a derivative work) as a whole must be licensed under the GPL
and only the GPL. All the rest falls under "mere aggregation".
Stop bullshiting poor Marcin, retard dak.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, (continued)
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, David Kastrup, 2006/08/17
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17