[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:48:04 +0200 |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, and he quite clearly stated that their product as a whole was
> > supposed to have a GPLed component, ergo be a combined work derived
> > from (among others) the GPLed piece.
>
> His product as whole is NOT a derivative work, idiot.
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040207022922296
>
> SCO:
>
> 30. The various identified versions of UNIX are sometimes referred
> to as UNIX flavors. All commercial UNIX flavors in use today are
> modifications of, and derivative works based on, the UNIX System V
> Technology (System V Technology).
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2004040118450269
>
> IBM:
>
> 30. Denies the averments of paragrpah 30 as they relate to IBM and
> Sequent or to AIX and Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develps,
> manufactures and markets a product under the name "Dynix/ptx".
Err. Buggy groklaw trascriber.
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-126-2.pdf
30. Denies the averments of paragraph 30 as they relate to IBM and
Sequent or to AIX or Dynix/ptx, except states that IBM develops,
manufactures and markets a product under the trade name "AIX" and
Sequent developed, manufactured and marketed a product under the
name "Dynix/ptx".
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, (continued)
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
Re: Combining GPL and commercial license, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/17