[Gnu-music-discuss] Re: Tie issues...

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> David Raleigh Arnold <address@hidden>
> > 
> > It is important to be clear about what is necessary and what is not when
> > making up rules. :-)
> > 
> 
> I guess you and I have different rule books.
[snip]

Someone is making a too-large fuss over this. What you describe is
standard notation.  Anyways:

--- local-key-engraver.cc~      Mon Jul 17 12:44:58 2000
+++ local-key-engraver.cc       Mon Sep 11 18:16:48 2000
@@ -117,7 +117,15 @@
              Side_position::add_support (key_item_p_,support_l);
            }
          
-         if (!forget)
+         /*
+           We should not record the accidental if it is the first
+           note and it is tied from the previous measure.
+
+           This also works, mostly, but will this always do the
+           correct thing?
+
+          */
+         if (!forget && !tie_changes)
            {
              /*
                not really really correct if there are more than one
@@ -127,19 +135,6 @@
                                                             gh_int2scm (n)),
                                          gh_int2scm (a)); 
 
-#if 0
-             /*
-               TESTME!
-              */
-             if (!tied_l_arr_.find_l (support_l))
-               {
-                 local_key_.clear_internal_forceacc (note_l->pitch_);
-               }
-             else if (tie_changes)
-               {
-                 local_key_.set_internal_forceacc (note_l->pitch_);
-               }
-#endif
            }
         }
 


-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/