[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU Distribution
From: |
Aurélien |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU Distribution |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:38:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Yes, and this explain the interest of Parabola (Free side of Arch)
https://parabolagnulinux.org
At this time we have also an
. AUR (arch user repository)
. PUR (parabola user repository)
which works via our own works.
We use Pacman (for package management)
We have also our own free sytem builder from chroot including
. libremakepkg
. librestage
. librerelease
which push automatically to the repo ...
Well we have tried to follow the Arch (KISS principle model) and free
software as best as possible.
I do not say that it is what you need, but PKGBUILDS system, seems to be
what you are searching for.
So maybe you wish to stay with apt-get ... maybe you can adapt apt-get
to build stage and release PKGBUILDS adapted system to your needs and
try to make something more K.I.S.S. than the parabola's devtools ;-)
Ian Bentley <address@hidden> writes:
> A few threads behind in the conversation now, but I think there is a really
> great model for a source based package distribution with
> ArchLinux's AUR system.
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository
>
> AUR is really neat - you define a package by including the source, as well as
> any required resources, and finally you include a PKGBUILD
> file, which defines a list of dependencies, and provides the required build
> steps.
>
> As a user of AUR, I simply pull a tarball containing all the above
> information, from the repository, I untar the package, and modify the
> PKGBUILD for my particular environment, adding or removing flags, adjusting
> the install location, or whatever else I want to customize. The
> final step is to use the makepkg application, which run the installation
> scripts.
>
> idb
>
> On 3 April 2012 08:32, Aurélien <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> address@hidden (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
>
> > > and it will install in /usr/local which does not work for all
> > > packages.
> >
> > I assert that would be a problem with those package, not with APT.
> >
> > If APT is the package manager, then it is a problem with APT not with
> > the package.
> >
> >
> <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
>
> Since you wish to build something new, why do you stay on the idea of
> APT?
>
> Since you wish to build something flexible, why do you stay on the idea
> of APT?
>
> If you stay in the model of APT, don't gNewSense and Trisquel already
> respond to your wish?
>
> -- Aurelien
>
> --
> Ian Bentley
>
--
Aurelien Desbrieres
In stupidity, i am the expert x-D
K.I.S.S. principle + Freedom
wow that is cool!
and Emacs in Stumpwm in a Parabola ... is the fact that for the first
time i have stop to waste my time to search the most efficient tools!
A salute GNU!
And one more time Thanks you so much that no word exist to describe how
i am happy ridding in knowledge on my free GNU!
- Re: A GNU Distribution, (continued)
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/09
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/09
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2012/04/03
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Dave Crossland, 2012/04/03
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2012/04/03
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Aurélien, 2012/04/03
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Ian Bentley, 2012/04/03
- Re: A GNU Distribution,
Aurélien <=
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/04
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Christophe Poncy, 2012/04/05
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/06
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Jason Self, 2012/04/06
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Jonathan Carter, 2012/04/07
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Richard Stallman, 2012/04/07
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2012/04/07
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Jason Self, 2012/04/07
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Jason Self, 2012/04/07
- Re: A GNU Distribution, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2012/04/07