Re: [gnugo-devel] GNU Go 2.0 and Liberty 1.0

[Aloril]

On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 17:31, address@hidden wrote:
> > Is it OK to enter GNU Go 2.0, Liberty 1.0 and 
> > heavily randomized GNU Go 3.6 to Sixth and
> > any future KGS Computer Go Tournaments in Open division?
> 
> I don't see a problem if Gunnar, Arend and Paul do
> not.  I understand from your previous messages that
> this is OK with Nick Wedd.  But I have a comment
> about the following:
> 
> > --name="tuned GnuGo. If I'm too hard, try SimpleBot. 
> > If I'm too easy, try human s or LibertyBot. - "
> 
> This could be misunderstood to imply that the
> program is stronger than GNU Go, for two
> reasons. First, tuning to us is a process of
> improving the program, and second, GNU Go is
> not mentioned as an alternative under ``If I'm too
> easy ...''
> 

Announce line was/is this:
GnuGo 3.6 with a lot of randomization

I have changed that blurb also to read this:
--name="heavily randomized GnuGo. If I'm too hard, try SimpleBot. If I'm
too easy, try humans or LibertyBot. - "

> The reason we might care is that someone might form
> a negative opinion about GNU Go after defeating an
> older or deliberately weakened version.
> 
> Daniel Bump
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
-- 
Aloril <address@hidden>