[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Oficial Website
From: |
Luis Felipe López Acevedo |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Oficial Website |
Date: |
Mon, 18 May 2015 11:53:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5 |
On 2015-05-18 10:47, Andreas Enge wrote:
Hello!
Hi, Andreas.
The "mobile phone" part of the responsive design activates itself quite
early;
personally, I am using a window that is a bit larger than half of my
laptop
screen, and the mobile phone design looks weird. For instance, the menu
consists of six large panes, stacked vertically, with just a tiny bit
of text
("Download", etc.) in the left corner, which takes at most 20% of the
width
(while the full menu takes almost all of the height; so basically I am
sitting
in front of a grey window with a bit of orange text in it). I would say
that
the standard layout (with the menu items going from left to right in
one row)
should be activated as soon as all the menu items fit. Maybe around 600
pixels
of window width instead of around 1000, or even down to 500 or 400
pixels?
Yes, I agree. The current design discriminates between two ranges of
screens only. So a new range could be added to avoid the too-much-menu
issue in wide-enough screens.
On the download page, the items are all arranged vertically, with lots
of free
space to their sides. Maybe this is also why John is seeing so much
free space?
In full screen mode, I have three columns, which is a good use of the
space.
On the download page, I would make the logos and file names clickable;
then
maybe the download button becomes superfluous altogether. And maybe
keep a bit
more space between the items, or some kind of line; especially in phone
mode,
it is a bit difficult to decide whether the "download" button belongs
to the
item described above or below it (but the correct solution, the item
above,
is the more intuitive one, so there is no big problem here).
Ludovic suggested before that we could make the download items more
compact, and I agree. For example, instead of having one download item
per architecture, we would have one item for GuixSD and one item for
Guix, each of them listing the available download alternatives
(architecture, source, ...). For example:
-------------------
GuixSD 0.8.2
USB installer of the Guix System Distribution.
Download for x86_64 (get signature)
Download for xi686 (get signature)
Download for ... (get signature)
See installation instructions
-------------------
In this design, the clickable logos and names would not work, but the
other changes you suggest do fit. I'm going to try this as soon as
possible if people think is alright.
Thanks for the feedback, Andreas.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, (continued)
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Amirouche BOUBEKKI, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Luis Felipe López Acevedo, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Luis Felipe López Acevedo, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, John Darrington, 2015/05/19
Re: Guix Oficial Website, Andreas Enge, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website,
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <=
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Andreas Enge, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Luis Felipe López Acevedo, 2015/05/18
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Luis Felipe López Acevedo, 2015/05/21
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Andreas Enge, 2015/05/21
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/05/21
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Luis Felipe López Acevedo, 2015/05/21
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/05/22
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Luis Felipe López Acevedo, 2015/05/23
- Re: Guix Oficial Website, Mathieu Lirzin, 2015/05/24